I went to
a meeting on precision farming where a speaker encouraged us to take four
aerial photos a year of our fields. He suggested a picture in March when
the frost was leaving the fields. A second picture can be taken when the
crops are approaching full canopy in June. A third picture can be taken
in the fall around August or September when the corn is drying down. A
fourth picture can be taken around September when the soybeans are starting
to yellow. The photos can show differences that can be examined that you
would never suspect from the ground. It can show the old tile lines in
March. It can show eroded spots on the hills as well as show wet spots
in the corners. You can see the replanted soybeans in the lower middle
of the photo below. I can move my grid soil sample locations that appear
to be on the edge of different soil conditions. My cousin Ross flew us
around the fields the first time without the benefit of Farm Site Mate
for about two and a half hours while we hunted for the fields. We were
not very efficient in flying back and forth.
My biggest disappointment was the distortion of the field pictures when
we were slightly off to the side. We tried to fly over the middle, but
the distortion was worse than I would have thought. I could almost tell
when to click the picture for the one direction, but it was hard to guide
the plane to the right or left.
The second flight was improved by using Farm Works Farm Site Mate. I put
all the field boundaries in a file at home on the desktop computer. I
then added the flight course by trying to trace the most efficient route
to fly over all the fields. I even put a target over the middle of each
field to help take a square picture.
My brother was the navigator on the flight. He could tell the pilot
whether to move to the right or left as we approached each field by looking
at our target on the handheld IPAQ. The planned flight path and our actual
position showed. We did not use the re-radiating antenna. It would have
been difficult to run the cord outside. We felt that we would be within
30 feet of the actual position. It was even helpful to warn me as the
cameraman when a field was coming up. The plane is allowed to fly without
the back door and I took the pictures from there. I cabled myself inside.
I used a Kodak DC3400 digital camera. This made if easier to import the
pictures into the computer. It eliminated the expense of film and the
need to change film in the air. The 2.0 megapixel resolution looks fine
until I zoom in to look at small areas. I think that I would like to use
a 4 or 5 megapixel camera the next time. A film camera would take better
pictures.
I took 84 pictures the second flight and saved the best 34. I geo-referenced
the pictures to use in my mapping software. It is very helpful to have
an aerial photo as a layer in any job. It is especially helpful when showing
a few points, such as in soil sampling. I used a photo editor to stretch
the photos to scale. I rotated the pictures to make the top North. It
took much less time to edit the photos the second flight when we used
Site Mate.
We flew at 6500 feet elevation above sea level with the ground at about
1000 feet the first flight. We flew at 7500 feet the next time so I could
also get a mile shot with the up and down direction on the camera. I believe
that we were flying about 120 miles per hour.
I don't know if we will try to take pictures four times every year. I
do know that we will always use Farm Works Farm Site Mate to guide us
when we do.
THUMBNAILS
Click for Enlargements
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Origonal logged flight path with no plan.
|
Flight path plan using Farm Site Mate.
|
Acutal logged flight path using planned path as
a guide.
|
 |
 |
| Aerial photo taken in the spring |
Aerial Photo of same field taken later in the summer. |
|